OME Factory Patek Philippe 5822P and 5712 V2 Super Clone Review

Reading Time: About 4 minutes

After a quiet stretch of several months, OME Factory has officially re-entered the market with two significant releases that quickly caught the attention of watch collectors. Their earlier Nautilus 5712 replica established a solid reputation—many enthusiasts actually preferred it over the PPF version for its richer dial color, more accurate moon phase disc, refined hands, and deeper movement engravings. Then, the factory went silent without giving much of an explanation. Now OME is back taking orders, bringing out a revised V2 edition of the Nautilus 5712 alongside an all-new release: the Cubitus 5822P.

Nautilus 5712 V2: Examining the Movement Upgrades

The V2 update focuses entirely on refining the super clone 240 movement architecture. Rather than changing the exterior, OME targeted two key areas on the main movement plate to bring it closer to genuine Patek Philippe finishing:

  • Golden Tube Surrounding the Ruby Bearing: On genuine calibers, a brass-colored bushing rings the jewel setting. The V1 omitted this detail, but the V2 reproduces the golden surround with correct proportions.

OME 5712 V2 Golden Tube Detail

  • Corrected C-Shaped Plate Opening: The cutout geometry adjacent to the balance bridge has been reshaped into a distinct C-profile, replacing the flatter cutout found on the original release.

OME 5712 V2 C-shaped Opening Detail

Beyond these specific tweaks, the movement plates on the V2 carry noticeably deeper, sharper engravings than PPF’s 5712. The plate surface also looks brighter and cleaner under macro lenses, giving a higher-end impression through the sapphire caseback.

A quick buying note on delivery times: Lead times for the 5712 V2 from OME are currently running longer than usual. Expect a bit of a wait after placing an order rather than the standard turnaround.


OME Cubitus 5822P: First Hands-On Impression

The newly introduced Cubitus line from Patek Philippe has generated a ton of buzz, and collectors have been asking whether a proper super clone of the 5822P exists. OME’s new entry adopts the same super clone 240 base movement used in their 5712, built into the angular, square-cased profile of the Cubitus.

OME Cubitus 5822P Front Angle

The sunburst blue dial responds well to changing light conditions, keeping a rich tone without appearing washed out or overly glossy.

OME Cubitus 5822P Full Face View

Case finishing combines brushed tops with mirror-polished chamfers along the edges, defining the bold square shape and integrated ears.

OME Cubitus 5822P Blue Dial Sunlight View

The crown guards are cut clean, surrounding a signed crown with sharp, legible Calatrava cross relief.

OME Cubitus 5822P Case Profile

OME Cubitus 5822P Crown Detail

Transitions near the lugs and strap integration stay tight, allowing the composite blue strap to flow smoothly around the wrist.

OME Cubitus 5822P Lug Integration

The deployant clasp carries crisp branding stamps and operates with a firm, solid click on closure.

OME Cubitus 5822P Blue Strap

OME Cubitus 5822P Deployant Buckle


Factory Comparison: OME vs PPF vs P1

Before OME entered the picture, both PPF and P1 Factory released their versions of the 5822P. Comparing the movement execution across all three reveals clear differences in quality and value:

OME Super Clone 240 Movement Architecture

OME vs. PPF: Both factories share the true micro-rotor super clone 240 layout. However, PPF’s movement plate engravings are noticeably shallow and flat. Under macro photography, OME’s plates feature far deeper, cleaner lettering that reflects light better.

PPF 5822 Shallow Engraving Comparison

OME vs. P1 Factory: P1 was early to the market, but their movement design is fundamentally inaccurate. The micro-rotor location and balance wheel placement sit in the wrong positions relative to genuine caliber 240 specs. Given P1’s higher price tag, it is tough to recommend over OME.

P1 Factory 5822 Incorrect Micro-Rotor Position

If you already own the OME 5712 V1, upgrading to the V2 isn’t strictly necessary unless you are a die-hard stickler for micro-level movement details. On the wrist, both versions look and wear identically. But for anyone buying new, the V2 is unquestionably the more complete package.

For the Cubitus 5822P, OME currently holds the sweet spot. It offers superior movement architecture over P1 and better plate engraving quality than PPF. If you don’t mind navigating the longer wait times, OME is the top pick for both models right now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *